Can they sail on to Pugad and Sabah?
December 29, 2015 Blog; Tuesday.
Are
those Faeldon’s little boys and girls on the excursion to one of the islands of
the Spratley’s or the Kalayaan Islands Group? Marine Capt. Faeldon is the
self-styled “patriot” who wanted to sail on his own small dinghy to some of the
Kalayaan Islands to confront China’s force present there.
The
Philippine military authorities intelligent and formidable patriots as they
are, such as Navy chief Rear Admiral Caesar Taccad has already said that there
are no problems with the Chinese forces in the disputed areas, but little
Marine Capt. Faeldon wanted to make a point as he tried at Oakwood trying to
lead his own little band which was never recognized as much as the genuine
reformist Magdalo officers, and then at the Manila Peninsula stand-off and
siege in 2007 from whre Faeldon escaped dressed as a woman leaving behind the
other Magdalo officers and civilians to face Gloria Arroyo’s wrath.
As
Faeldon failed to get endorsement of his Popeye the Sailor strategy on the
China Sea/West Philippine Sea controversy he supposedly recruited 10,000
Filipino youths to sail to the disputed areas and is raising P 1-Billion for
transport and other expenses. So a group of young Filipinos did finally sail
there recently and took pictures on an unoccupied island.
Great
story! Now, how about sailing on to Pugad Island of the same group of island
that Philippine troops occupied in 1968 under instructions of then President
Ferdinand E. Marcos but which South Vietnam invaded in 1975 in the stealth of
night and while the Philippine troops
went off to a social dance party on another islet.
And below Filipino officers now
apparently celebrate the conquest of the invaders with the invaders… hahaha.
Claim versus Occupation and Possession.
Claim:
verb1.state or assert that something is the case, typically
without providing evidence or proof.
|
noun1.an assertion of the truth of something, typically one that is
disputed or in doubt.
demand or request for something
considered one's due.
There
are many parties claiming this and that, what matters in the end if possession,
continuous control and administration. This is why Philippine President
Ferdinand E. Marcos started occupying with Philippine troops numerous islands
of the Spratleys as early as his first term of office. Yet the Philippines
under the Marcos successors like Cory Aquino, Fidel V. Ramos, etc. allowed
these islands already occupied to deteriorateand become derelict.
The
Philippines’ interest in the islands started in 1949 which, to simplify we
quote, “…
businessman and maritime entrepreneur
Tomas Cloma claimed to have discovered in 1949 but which Wikipedia reports “having
been inhabited, at various times in history, by the Chinese and by people from
the Champa Kingdom of Vietnam, and during the second world war, French
Indochina and Imperial Japanese troops.”
More recent history.
For
convenience we review from Wiki: “Japan occupied the Paracels and the Spratlys
from February 1939 to August 1945….Parts of the Paracels and
Spratlys were occupied by Republic of China after the 1945 surrender of
Japan, since the Allied powers assigned the Republic of China to receive
Japanese surrenders in that area,…
Filipino Tomas
Cloma uprooted an ROC flag on Itu Aba laid claim to the Spratlys and, the Republic
of China again regarrisoned Itu Aba on 1956…. In 1946, the
Americans reminded the Philippines at its independence that the Spratlys was
not Philippine territory, both to not anger Chiang
Kai-shek in China and because the Spratlys were not part of the
Philippines per the 1898 treaty Spain signed with America.”
But on Sabah…
The Philippines
media in recent reports states, “The Philippine claim over Sabah is solid.…
Thus said eminent statesman Jovito
Salonga 50 years ago, in his speech… to the Anglo-Philippine Talks held in
London.The speech, delivered on radio and television on March 30, 1963, … At
the time, the Federation of Malaysia was scheduled to be formally created on
August 31, 1963 … (so Philipine cliam predates even the existence of Malaysia…)
…(Salonga) cited the following proofs and arguments that Sabah remained under the dominion and sovereignty of the Sultan of Sulu:In 1881, when the Spanish and Dutch governments protested the award of the Royal Charter to the British North Borneo Company, the British clarified that "sovereignty remains with the Sultan of Sulu" … former American Governor-General F.B. Harrison, then Special Adviser to the Philippine Government on Foreign Affairs, advised…"to denounce the cession order as a unilateral set in violation of legal right." (by the British government)… Sabah thus cannot be part of the Federation of Malaysia as "conceived, inspired, and sponsored" by the British….
…(Salonga) cited the following proofs and arguments that Sabah remained under the dominion and sovereignty of the Sultan of Sulu:In 1881, when the Spanish and Dutch governments protested the award of the Royal Charter to the British North Borneo Company, the British clarified that "sovereignty remains with the Sultan of Sulu" … former American Governor-General F.B. Harrison, then Special Adviser to the Philippine Government on Foreign Affairs, advised…"to denounce the cession order as a unilateral set in violation of legal right." (by the British government)… Sabah thus cannot be part of the Federation of Malaysia as "conceived, inspired, and sponsored" by the British….
No comments:
Post a Comment